<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why PR isn&#8217;t all Max Clifford</title>
	<atom:link href="http://questprblog.com/180/why-pr-isnt-all-max-clifford/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://questprblog.com/180/why-pr-isnt-all-max-clifford/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:19:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: April</title>
		<link>http://questprblog.com/180/why-pr-isnt-all-max-clifford/comment-page-1/#comment-4968</link>
		<dc:creator>April</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 06:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://questprblog.com/180/why-pr-isnt-all-max-clifford/#comment-4968</guid>
		<description>Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say 
that I have really liked reading your blog posts. In any case 
I&#039;ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say<br />
that I have really liked reading your blog posts. In any case<br />
I&#8217;ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nigel</title>
		<link>http://questprblog.com/180/why-pr-isnt-all-max-clifford/comment-page-1/#comment-3698</link>
		<dc:creator>Nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 13:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://questprblog.com/180/why-pr-isnt-all-max-clifford/#comment-3698</guid>
		<description>MC occupies a specific and specialised branch of PR. Effectively, he is a publicist - pure and simple - and a good one at that. He gives journalists what they want and knows enough editors to place his clients where the money is. 

Not having met the man, I don&#039;t know about his scruples, but I am sure he would find much of the PR industry navel gazing quite funny. Most of us probably secretly envy his high-fee, high-profile media act. Perhaps there&#039;s something we could learn from his style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MC occupies a specific and specialised branch of PR. Effectively, he is a publicist &#8211; pure and simple &#8211; and a good one at that. He gives journalists what they want and knows enough editors to place his clients where the money is. </p>
<p>Not having met the man, I don&#8217;t know about his scruples, but I am sure he would find much of the PR industry navel gazing quite funny. Most of us probably secretly envy his high-fee, high-profile media act. Perhaps there&#8217;s something we could learn from his style.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Seaman</title>
		<link>http://questprblog.com/180/why-pr-isnt-all-max-clifford/comment-page-1/#comment-2130</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Seaman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 07:08:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://questprblog.com/180/why-pr-isnt-all-max-clifford/#comment-2130</guid>
		<description>You and your readers might enjoy my two PR blogs on the same subject, which both provoked a condemnation of Max Clifford from CIPR President Kevin Taylor. The second post includes an interview with Max putting the case for the defence in response to Kevin&#039;s robust condemnation of Max on my blog.

http://paulseaman.eu/2009/03/homage-to-jade-goody-and-max-clifford/

http://paulseaman.eu/2009/03/max-clifford-tells-it-straight-me-online/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You and your readers might enjoy my two PR blogs on the same subject, which both provoked a condemnation of Max Clifford from CIPR President Kevin Taylor. The second post includes an interview with Max putting the case for the defence in response to Kevin&#8217;s robust condemnation of Max on my blog.</p>
<p><a href="http://paulseaman.eu/2009/03/homage-to-jade-goody-and-max-clifford/" rel="nofollow">http://paulseaman.eu/2009/03/homage-to-jade-goody-and-max-clifford/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://paulseaman.eu/2009/03/max-clifford-tells-it-straight-me-online/" rel="nofollow">http://paulseaman.eu/2009/03/max-clifford-tells-it-straight-me-online/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma Long</title>
		<link>http://questprblog.com/180/why-pr-isnt-all-max-clifford/comment-page-1/#comment-2059</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:49:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://questprblog.com/180/why-pr-isnt-all-max-clifford/#comment-2059</guid>
		<description>I agree with a lot of your points. I have also posted an entry on my own blog with regards his methods of practice at http://wwwemmalong.blogspot.com 

I question whether Max Clifford practises traditional &#039;PR&#039; as we know it whether through theoretical studying or what we ourselves have put into practice or wonder whether it is simply good issues and crisis management?

Is Max Clifford really a good PRO or simply just a spin doctor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with a lot of your points. I have also posted an entry on my own blog with regards his methods of practice at <a href="http://wwwemmalong.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://wwwemmalong.blogspot.com</a> </p>
<p>I question whether Max Clifford practises traditional &#8216;PR&#8217; as we know it whether through theoretical studying or what we ourselves have put into practice or wonder whether it is simply good issues and crisis management?</p>
<p>Is Max Clifford really a good PRO or simply just a spin doctor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

