Why PR isn’t all Max Clifford

One of the things I learnt quickly about working in PR is that most people have no clue what it involves. Some pretend they know what you do – but don’t, others simply glaze over and move on to a new subject and of the small proportion that have an idea, most reckon I’m a mini-Max Clifford.
Mr Clifford’s ubiquity of late thanks to his work with media-darling Jade Goody has no doubt ratcheted up that ignorance. His standing, success and reputation within his field ensure he remains at the centre of most people’s perceptions of PR – for better and for worse.
Reading a double-page spread feature on him in Saturday’s Guardian it struck me just how narrow a field of PR Clifford represents – indeed he was himself at pains to highlight that only 20 per cent of his work is people coming to him with stories. Notwithstanding Goody’s recent blanket media coverage, Clifford has had a key hand in the story of 13-year old Alfie Patten which has resulted in a media bun-fight over the paternity of a new-born baby.
The power Clifford wields over journalists is impressive – though concerning. While when I wear my PR hat I recognise part of my job is to secure positive coverage for clients by positioning well-written press releases, interesting stories and eye-catching photography. I also still want my media to remain as impartial as possible and inform me about news from around the world.
In Clifford’s own words: “Most journalists would sell their own mothers for a great story, but sometimes you’re able to make them an offer that they think they shouldn’t refuse.
I’ll find them a job or I’ll come up with something that means they won’t lose their job.”
Stephen Waddington among others have recently been debating about whether our industry body the Chartered Institute of Public Relations should play more of a regulatory role in enforcing a Code of Practice. Difficult though this may be I do think it’s something worth considering – particularly where such prominent members of the industry use such underhand tactics to get their own way.
We continue to be approached by companies that have been through the PR mill – despairing of the lack of accountability from agencies they have employed. Sloppiness, poor standards and dodgy dealings sadly remain commonplace within our industry. Indeed, Quest was established explicitly to avoid this type of behaviour – even when it means we turn down business that creates conflicts of interest and doesn’t meet our high standards.
No matter how keen my clients were for media coverage there are personal and corporate boundaries I would never cross. Manipulating journalists’ careers and personal lives is distinctly beyond the pale.
So, I’ll happily throw my hat into the ring for greater industry regulation – safe in the knowledge that those who damage the reputation of PR are curtailed.










I agree with a lot of your points. I have also posted an entry on my own blog with regards his methods of practice at http://wwwemmalong.blogspot.com
I question whether Max Clifford practises traditional ‘PR’ as we know it whether through theoretical studying or what we ourselves have put into practice or wonder whether it is simply good issues and crisis management?
Is Max Clifford really a good PRO or simply just a spin doctor?
Comment made on 24 February, 2009 @ 3:49 pm
You and your readers might enjoy my two PR blogs on the same subject, which both provoked a condemnation of Max Clifford from CIPR President Kevin Taylor. The second post includes an interview with Max putting the case for the defence in response to Kevin’s robust condemnation of Max on my blog.
http://paulseaman.eu/2009/03/homage-to-jade-goody-and-max-clifford/
http://paulseaman.eu/2009/03/max-clifford-tells-it-straight-me-online/
Comment made on 6 March, 2009 @ 7:08 am
MC occupies a specific and specialised branch of PR. Effectively, he is a publicist – pure and simple – and a good one at that. He gives journalists what they want and knows enough editors to place his clients where the money is.
Not having met the man, I don’t know about his scruples, but I am sure he would find much of the PR industry navel gazing quite funny. Most of us probably secretly envy his high-fee, high-profile media act. Perhaps there’s something we could learn from his style.
Comment made on 11 May, 2009 @ 1:32 pm
Pretty nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say
that I have really liked reading your blog posts. In any case
I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon!
Comment made on 24 June, 2009 @ 6:44 am